At this price, the H.264 hour of video would cost

At this price, the H.264 hour of video would cost

At this price, the H.264 hour of video would cost

At this price, the H.264 hour of video would cost [[

At this price, the H.264 hour of video would cost $0.04 to deliver, the VP9/HEVC $0.03, for a savings of $0.01 per hourly view.Combine that knowledge with a spreadsheet, and you can go in all sorts of interesting directions.Like how much it costs to convert your content to VP9/HEVC and how many views you need to recoup that cost.Just for fun, we can apply these numbers to You Tube and VP9 and see exactly why Google bought On2.Of course, we have to make some assumptions, as dangerous as that can be. None of the cloud houses that produce HEVC would share their pricing, other than noting that it was more expensive than H.264, which make sense since it’s at least twice as CPU-intensive, as is VP9.

||At this price, the H.264 hour of video would cost $0.04 to deliver, the VP9/HEVC $0.03, for a savings of $0.01 per hourly view.

]].04 to deliver, the VP9/HEVC [[At this price, the H.264 hour of video would cost $0.04 to deliver, the VP9/HEVC $0.03, for a savings of $0.01 per hourly view.Combine that knowledge with a spreadsheet, and you can go in all sorts of interesting directions.Like how much it costs to convert your content to VP9/HEVC and how many views you need to recoup that cost.Just for fun, we can apply these numbers to You Tube and VP9 and see exactly why Google bought On2.Of course, we have to make some assumptions, as dangerous as that can be. None of the cloud houses that produce HEVC would share their pricing, other than noting that it was more expensive than H.264, which make sense since it’s at least twice as CPU-intensive, as is VP9.

||At this price, the H.264 hour of video would cost $0.04 to deliver, the VP9/HEVC $0.03, for a savings of $0.01 per hourly view.

]].03, for a savings of [[At this price, the H.264 hour of video would cost $0.04 to deliver, the VP9/HEVC $0.03, for a savings of $0.01 per hourly view.Combine that knowledge with a spreadsheet, and you can go in all sorts of interesting directions.Like how much it costs to convert your content to VP9/HEVC and how many views you need to recoup that cost.Just for fun, we can apply these numbers to You Tube and VP9 and see exactly why Google bought On2.Of course, we have to make some assumptions, as dangerous as that can be. None of the cloud houses that produce HEVC would share their pricing, other than noting that it was more expensive than H.264, which make sense since it’s at least twice as CPU-intensive, as is VP9.

||At this price, the H.264 hour of video would cost $0.04 to deliver, the VP9/HEVC $0.03, for a savings of $0.01 per hourly view.

]].01 per hourly view.Combine that knowledge with a spreadsheet, and you can go in all sorts of interesting directions.Like how much it costs to convert your content to VP9/HEVC and how many views you need to recoup that cost.Just for fun, we can apply these numbers to You Tube and VP9 and see exactly why Google bought On2.Of course, we have to make some assumptions, as dangerous as that can be. None of the cloud houses that produce HEVC would share their pricing, other than noting that it was more expensive than H.264, which make sense since it’s at least twice as CPU-intensive, as is VP9..04 to deliver, the VP9/HEVC [[If you download 1080p streams of H.264 and compare them to 1080p VP9 streams, VP9 is about 43 percent more efficient, while 720p streams are about 35 percent more efficient.

Obviously, that will drop for lower resolution streams, so let’s assume that both VP9 and HEVC will deliver, on average, a 25 percent bandwidth savings.

## 48 Comments