' from which this peal waa proaecut Appellant irni^ts that the evidence does not ? Thin que : of fact was submitted to t i nation on conflicting evidence re of the opinion is sufficient svidence in h s reo rt ( a court and sufficient to prohibit us from reversing en t t ground. Bao feel firm under this testimony, the case havin bssn aubmitte to a Jury and they havinr paased upon the questions of fact, but there ia sufficient error in one of the iruti tions &iven for the people to require a reversal o judgment on the ground of the iving of t at inetructicn alone.
o + k U otiitp of Illinois: within and for the ond District of tljjfe btate I Present — The Hon.
When she testified on the rial resulting in the judgment which ia from, 11 j f th time she testified concerning the 2 facts.